Follow us on Twitter
Error
  • AutoTweet NG Automator-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
  • AutoTweet NG Content-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
  • AutoTweet NG Kunena-Plugin - AutoTweet NG Component is not installed or not enabled.
Antichrist (dir. Lars Von Trier)
Viewings
Written by Ravi   
Wednesday, 30 December 2009 18:09

antichristI wish to inform the internet that I have finished watching Antichrist (aka The Continuing Adventures of Carson Clay) by Lars Von Trier. It wasn't easy. This is a movie that felled the likes of GK and even Bhalla who along with ravenus has been known to sit through and appreciate movies so slow, it's almost like they were staring at a photograph.

But after over four sittings and two months, I am finally done. Was it worth the effort? Frankly, no. The bare fact that a movie takes so much effort is in and of itself an indictment of the film. Antichrist was apparently filmed by Lars Von Trier when in the throes of a great depression. According to Wiki, he was given to fits of weeping through the course of filming. I am tempted to think this was caused by what remains of LVT's conscience, knowing he was putting together an awful film and yet unable to stop himself. 

What's annoying is that Antichrist has a potentially great story that's being totally fucked over and subsumed by the pretensions of its director. In this film William Dafoe a self assured psychotherapist (who isn't assigned a name but who I've decided to call Carson Clay) decides to pull his wife off the drug related therapy she's been getting for depression after their child's death. They hotfoot it back to Eden, their cabin in the woods. (Sadly, this is not the only time Von Trier will go Biblical on our asses before the film is through. The blatant and obvious attempts at giving this film a metaphoric depth just make it come across as super cheesy). 

{multithumb thumb_width=668 thumb_height=352}antichrist_carsonclay

In and around Eden, there's evidence of nature itself having gone horribly corrupt which ties in somewhat with the wife's paranoia about the place. There are a few effective sequences like the one where Clay sees a deer with a stillborn fawn hanging halfway out of it, and the one where Horsey, his horse faced wife, (can't be arsed to find her name) runs around the woods trying to investigate the sound of a child crying only to find that the noise persists even after she discovers that her own kid is safe. There are also laugh out loud moments like the one where a fox stops committing harakiri long enough to tell Carson "Chaos Reigns!" in a death growl. All of these are ruined by endless amounts of staring and literally tons of joyless fucking. Subsuming even these are extended sequences of the woman sobbing uncontrollably. Yes, Lars Von Trier, we get the fact that she is (and you were) depressed, move the fuck on.

The tenor of the film changes dramatically over the last half hour. It becomes an outrageously funny over the top sex farce like Takashii Mike directing a Carry On Movie scripted by Cannibal Corpse. Horsey gets totally batshit insane and mashes Carson's balls to a pulp, except his boner, like Celine Dion's heart, still goes on. Faced with this demonic re-erection, Horsey strokes the zombie boner till it gives her a blood bukkake. She hammers a crudely fashioned tyre clamp on one of Carson's feet before taking off to wander the fuck around yelling. Clay wakes up pissed off, crawls into a hole and  attempts to murder a baby crow. Horsey finds him and after failing to pull him out of the hole, digs him out of it. And all the while Clay is pulling a wide range of incredibly comic faces. If this wasn't enough to get you to bust a gut laughing, Horsey attempts to make some sexy time with the husband, only to realise that the "I Cum Blood" sequence was Carson's last hurrah as a man. She chops her clit off in frustration. I guess this is why kids are told not to run with scissors - this movie makes such a move seem a natural and almost inevitable consequence. In the meantime, a fox, a deer and a bird wander about the scene like they were in the studio next door auditioning for a Disney movie, came over to check what the commotion was about and now can't help but stare in embarrassed fascination.

Idiots all over the internet are pondering the symbolism and imagery of this film, about what it all means and what Von Trier is trying to say. How about nothing, assholes? How about he just made as tedious and pointless a film as is humanly possible (without being David Lynch) as his depressed revenge against the world? Why are people so willing to attribute genius, thought and depth to wank jobs like Von Tirer, irrespective of what they churn out, and none to others like the directors of Mallu Porn films who fill their films with equal and in some cases even greater amounts of WTFery? 

Anyway, this is a pointless boring film that fails both as ponderous cerebral cinema and as horror. It's got the kind of middling shocks and scares that will only disconcert newbies, the very timid or art film wankers who have only seen movies by the likes of Wong Kar Wai, Pedro Almodovar and consider Coen Bros' No Country For Old Men the final word in edgy disturbing cinema.

rating0.5

 

Our valuable member Ravi has been with us since Thursday, 26 April 2007.

Show Other Articles Of This Author

More where this came from:

You need to login or register to post comments.
Discuss...
Discuss (2 posts)
Re: Antichrist (dir. Lars Von Trier)
Dec 31 2009 11:20:49
Hahahaha! Hilarious! I'm gonna stay away from this fo' sho'... (though this has been doing the 'Fucking crazy ass movie duuuude' rounds in the hostel along with Paranormal Activity)
#14234
Re: Antichrist (dir. Lars Von Trier)
Dec 31 2009 11:34:58
It's Coen Brothers, fool. Fixed.
#14235
Home Reviews Viewings Antichrist (dir. Lars Von Trier)